Hum... seems this bug has been around for a while (not just in the 1.9.0 branch).  I just downloaded the released 1.8.1 and it behaves the same. As Adrian mentioned, seems like this shipping example needs to be added to the automated test suite.

Thanks Adrian.

I'm completely new to OM (and Modelica in general) so bear with me.

I'm using the OM Connection Editor. According to TOOLS -> OPTIONS -> LIBRARIES I'm using the 'default' Modelica and default ModelicaReference. If I look under the COMPONENTS -> MODELICA -> USERSGUIDE -> RELEASENOTES, I see a 'version_3_1' and 'Version_3_1_BugFixes'. No version 3.2.1 though. If I wanted to switch to "Version_3_1_BugFixes" do I use this string in the TOOLS -> OPTIONS -> LIBRARIES dialog?

Joe

Hi Adrian.

FYI: I just uninstalled r12739 and installed today's r13381. It compiles on first try but the simulation has now run for well over 60 minutes with no sign of stopping... Seems like there is a problem.

Joe

I just installed 1.9.0 beta and opened the \Mechanics\MultiBody\Systems\RobotR3 example and then selected Simulate from the Simulate menu. On the first attempt the compile never completed (ran for a few hours). After shutting down and restarting it did compile but then the simulation never completed (ran for about an hour).

I'm on a 64-bit Windows 7 Professional Service Pack 1 machine with 8GB RAM and an i7-2760QM CPU.

I just tried to download "OpenModelica-BETA-revision-12739.exe" from:

https://build.openmodelica.org/omc/buil … ses/1.9.0/

However, Symantec Endpoint Protection quarantined the file stating: "Symantec has known about this file for more than 30 days. There is a lot of evidence that this file is untrustworthy."

I'm new to modelica and am interested in trying it out with OpenModelica but this type of a warning (albeit possibly a false positive) is a bit concerning. Can the development team give any kind of assurance that this is bogus? Do you all scan the outputs of your builds for viruses/malware?

Thx.

Joe