- Index
- » Usage and Applications
- » OpenModelica Usage and Applications
- » OM 190 works better than 192, why?
Page Start Prev 1 Next End
OM 190 works better than 192, why?
OM 190 works better than 192, why?
Jul-19-15 07:34:35
I tried to run some codes in OM 192 but gest errors very often. Surprisingly, OM 190 works for most of the codes which were not run using OM 192.
Has anyone noticed that or there are a different modeling instruction after 190?
Edited by: atame - Jul-19-15 08:23:22
Thank you
Re: OM 190 works better than 192, why?
Jul-19-15 13:43:51
That is strange. According to our library coverage 1.9.2 is way better than 1.9.0, but it depends a lot on what libraries you're trying to use.
It could be the case that for some old libraries 1.9.0 is better.
Do you have a list of what libraries work better in 1.9.0 and not in 1.9.2? If so, let us know so we can look into it.
- adrpo
-
-
- 885 Posts
Page Start Prev 1 Next End
- Index
- » Usage and Applications
- » OpenModelica Usage and Applications
- » OM 190 works better than 192, why?
There are 0 guests and 0 other users also viewing this topic
