I can add it to the list of libraries to test (it's not the the modelica-3rdparty repository that I usually check for free libraries; it is even in the modelica association github repository!).

I packaged powersystems for Linux and once modelica.org comes online again, I guess windows nightlies will also include them:
http://build.openmodelica.org/apt/pool/ … -1_all.deb
http://build.openmodelica.org/apt/pool/ … -1_all.deb

Flattening: https://test.openmodelica.org/hudson/jo … estReport/
Compilation: https://test.openmodelica.org/hudson/jo … estReport/
Simulation: https://test.openmodelica.org/hudson/jo … estReport/

And temporary location for the report (I might move it into hudson): https://test.openmodelica.org/libraries … rsive.html

thanks a lot.
I see that Power Systems is not OM-friendly, at least today.
But now we can also clearly wee what already works.

Massimo.

Thanks for adding this library to the tests. It's one I'd like to keep an eye on.

Yesterday I have succesfully compiled and executed with OM some of the tests models of the PowerSystems Library (V 0.2) (https://github.com/modelica/PowerSystem … /v0.2.zip)

The models that I have compiled are:
- PowerSystems.Examples.PowerWorld.Test.HydroPlantTest1
- PowerSystems.Examples.PowerWorld.Test.HydroPlantTest2
- PowerSystems.Examples.PowerWorld.Test.HydroPlantTest3

However, I had to modify two files of the PowerSystems Library to do it:
- File: main package.mo line 118:
  original:
    replaceable package PackagePhaseSystem =
  modified:
    package PackagePhaseSystem =

- File: generic.mo, lines 165, 238, 303, 391:
  original
   isRoot(terminal.theta)
  modified
   Connections.isRoot(terminal.theta)

Correction:
The name of the test models that I have succesfully compiled is wrong. The right names are

- PowerSystems.Examples.PowerWorld.Test.HydroPlantTest1
- PowerSystems.Examples.PowerWorld.Test.PowerPlantTest1
- PowerSystems.Examples.PowerWorld.Test.PowerPlantTest2